Dukh-i-zhizniki in America

An update of Molokans in America (Berokoff, 1969).   — IN-PROGRESS

Enhanced and edited by Andrei Conovaloff, since 2013.  Send comments to Administrator @ Molokane. org
Chapter 6 — Appearance of New Leaders  [<Chapter 5] [Contents] [Chapter 7>]

Contents
  1. Death of P.M. Shubin — updated: 7 August 2023
  2. nnn
  3. bbb
  4. bbb

1. Death of P.M. Shubin

[PAGE 103] The passing of Philip Mihailovitch* Shubin on January 9, 1932 removed a steadying and uniting influence from the brotherhood. It could he safely asserted that after his death the brotherhood was never the same again. No one was able to take his place** as the expounder of beliefs, traditions and doctrines to this day. His death came at a time when his prestige was needed as never before. It was a time when a new generation of zealous leadership was beginning to assert itself.

* Russians typically refer to people by their first name and patronymic (имя-отчество , imya-ochestvo), omitting the last name. In Russia I met many Spiritual Christians who knew their elders by only imya-ochestvo and could not tell me their surnames. It was frustrating while I was compiling a directory of congregations. In America, we tend to only use the surname. For clarity, I add surnames when omitted.

** In 1914 P. M. Shubin testified in court that he was "demoted" as leader, 18 years before his death. See end of Chapter 5. In 1928, three years before his death, Maksimisty succeeded in publishing their Kniga solnste, dukh i zhizn' which eventually transformed all Prygun congregations in Southern California to a new denominational family of faiths — Dukh-i-zhizniki — which use their new religious text as a third testament of the Bible. According to his grandson, the late Philip Philip Shubin, P. M. Shubin was not a Maksimist and opposed the new book being used as a religious text and placed on the altar table. His writings were published in it, which he evidently did not want to be held as equivalent or similar to the Bible.

It must he borne in mind that, like Philip Mihailovitch Shubin, who passed away at the age of 77, his contemporaries, the leading elders of the various congregations — those who, with Philip Mihailovitch Shubin, were responsible for the migration to America* were of his age and older, therefore, they were not as vigorous as formerly in holding the reins of the brotherhood,** consequently, their leadership was being challenged by the next age group,*** a challenge which they the immigrant elders resisted with resulting friction.

* P. M. Shubin is credited for leading a migration caravan of about 300 people, many draft-age males, from the Caucasus to Canada, but diverted to Los Angeles by P. A. Demens. The American Dukh-i-zhiznik oral history, that all fled to avoid military service, is contrary to testimony from other Spiritual Christian families who stated that their grandparents left Russia to avoid rents and taxes. Some came as "economic migrants" (not persecuted refugees) to earn money and return, or stay. Some returned home. Many other reasons could have been documented for why each person immigrated, but no one conducted a comprehensive survey. Those who repeated their preferred reason(s) for the migration the most seem to linger in the oral history. See Chapter 1: "Why did they wait so long in Russia? Why did 99% stay in Russia?"

**  Among "second generation" poor immigrants in the United States, juvenile crime and gangs occur naturally because the youth "do not have a root in the culture brought from the home country ... Rather they have their roots in the process of migration itself. ... (and) this process is a particular problem in immigrant groups having having high birth rates." (Waters, Tony. Crime and Immigrant Youth, 1998.)

*** The most zealous younger Spiritual Christians insisted that their tribal rituals, songs, prayers, and books were God-sent, and must replace the New Testament, and must be used by other Spiritual Christian faiths.

It was this challenge to older leadership — plus the desire to find ways and means to control the needless, and at times, acrimonious debates during religious meetings church services that, in the summer of 1932, concurrent with the publication of Pilgrims of Russia-Town, prompted

  1. the Prygun Selimskaia congregation (Vasili T. Sussoyeff, presbyter),
  2. the Prygun Karmolinovskaia or Bechanakskaia (Buchanak village) congregation (Nikifor A. Uraine, presbyter) and
  3. the Prygun Ol'shanskaia congregation (David P. Meloserdoff, presbyter)

to combine into one large congregation (bolshoi sobranie : big meeting, Americanized as "Big Church") with a bold new concept in Prygun Molokan church government, a concept that eventually caused a major reshuffle of congregation church membership affecting not only the congregations of Los Angeles but also all the congregations in the outlying communities — Arizona as well as the San Joaquin valley.

Mixed and intermarried among the above 3 Prygun congregations were real Molokane, like my grandmother Parasha Susoeff-Conovaloff in Arizona, who married a Pryguny but was allowed to remain Molokan in belief because Pryguny also kept the Molokan holidays. In contrast, members of Berokoff's Podval (Klubnikin, presbyter) congregation and the Melikoi-Prokhadnoe congregation were much more zealous, due to influence from their Maksimist, Klubnikinist, Novyy israil', Sionist, etc. believers, who rejected the Molokan holidays, and condemned the 3 congregations that united because they had a required board of directors, and a religious committee.

Can anyone explain why there was no Nikitino congregation, from the village of M.G. Rudomyotkin now in Armenia, the Maksimist faith dominated the most zealous tribes in Los Angeles from Kars Oblast, now in Turkey.

While most Molokan families moved to San Francisco and northern California, a minority of Molokane in Los Angeles and Southern California were outnumbered, and probably confused, by about a dozen different zealous Spiritual Christian faiths from Russia that were not Molokane but insisted on the Malakan or "Molokan" label for themselves and everyone else, as first advised by P.A. Demens. The Molokan identity was hijacked into a religious chaos.

Some Molokan families, and Molokan spouses married to a Prygun, remained with the Spiritual Christians by joining the most liberal new "Big Church" where they could find more like-minded friendships and mates, and socialize separately from the most zealous members of the other Dukh-i-zhiznik congregations. A few Molokane got the Holy Spirit and some became believers in the divinity of Rudomyotkin. The Maksimist congregations could not accept the Prygun holidays and hated the original Molokane among them, so they remained separated from "Big Church" to this day, while they forced "Big Church" to convert to the Maksimist rituals and books. It was like a huge strong tail wagging a weak dog. The very vocal, aggressive zealous minority persistently tried to rule the majority until it eventually wore them out, and chased the Americanized Christians away.

[PAGE 104] The three united Prygun congregations comprised a total membership of over 500 families in the 1930s and 700 in the 1960s. (I examined the registration cards in the 1960s.) This, large membership, of course, required a large building, so it was decided to purchase a site on 1714 East Third Street, between Bodie and Pecan Streets, where, in late summer of 1932, building operations were begun on a large handsome building for which a sum of money was enthusiastically subscribed. This site is now at the north end of 3rd Street east of Pecan Street, at the landscape bank of the I-5 Freeway. See the Google Map Street View (July 2012).


Map adapted from Sanborn Insurance Co., Los Angeles 1930, Volume 4, Sheet 1424, Geography Map Library, California Sate University, Northridge (CSUN). The new building had gas radiator heating, no chimney ("NO CH"), and electric lights. The dots along the outside wall corners of the building indicate brick construction (Sanborn Keys & Colors, Geography & Map Reading Room, Library of Congress website, Washington D.C.)

I first learned of the Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps in the late 1970s when Herb Fox, Map Librarian at California State University, Fresno, showed me the huge map books that just arrived for Fresno city. Herb helped me find many maps for my research, including those published in the 1980 Молокан Directory. He told me the
Los Angeles Sanborn maps were at the Cal-State University, Northridge (CSUN) Geography Department, which I visited during summer break. I found all the Boyle Heights and East Los Angeles maps stacked about 6 feet high in a small closet in the Geography Department, and the director was away for the summer. Staff showed me one book of the Flats, and I realized the books were very large, heavy and pages were too wavy (not flat) to photocopy. I would have to either trace each map, or print high resolution photos with a camera and money I did not have. Tracing would take about a month. I wish I traced them then to show to elders in Los Angeles before they died, to identify and relate stories. That history is lost. Previously I tried to map the Flats with a few elders (my relatives and others) to try to get them to draw a map of their childhood neighborhood. Their maps and memory were terrible. Later Harry Shubin managed to roughly draw a few maps on his own. I also drove a few elders through the Flats to point out buildings, which we did several times, but I had no easy way to document what they were pointing at and describing. About 2000, I went back to CSUN to photograph these maps with my new digital camera, a tripod and a lamp, but the photos were not satisfactory. The map librarians suggested that they could make high resolution photos because they were planning to digitize them, and I could purchase the first images. I ordered about 261 high resolution images for about $2,000. Months later in 2014 they sent me the images for Bethlehem, Boyle Heights to East Los Angeles, covering 1906 through 1940. About 2020, these images which I helped fund, went online. Read how the original maps were saved: Historical Atlases Rescued from the Trash Could Be a Boon to Historians, by Greg Miller, National Geographic, March 3, 2017.

While the building project was advancing, a detailed set of by-laws to govern such a large membership were being worked out by the younger educated men, some who also co-founded the UMCA in 1926. The fact that these "Big Church" organizers actually adopted "by-laws" shows that several leading members understood American laws of incorporating a non-profit. I suspect that they may have been advised by the Drs. Young, and maybe other organized churches. This organization indicated their Americanization and education. During this phase of the project the zealous prophet Afonasi T. Bezayeff was moved by the Holy Spirit to utter an unfavorable prophesy concerning the whole new development. He also announced and placed the new Kniga sontse, dukh i zhizn' on the altar tables. Other zealous prophets too, were active in opposition. The Maksimist Ivan W. Sussoyeff predicted that dire consequences will result from the union of the three congregations, that they will abandon some principal tenets of the Dukh-i-zhiznik Molokan faiths. All these predictions caused a considerable stir and endless discussions in the community, both pro and contrary.

In Los Angeles upon the 1928 publication of the Kniga solnste, dukh i zhizn', by 1930, within the first generation (25 years since immigration in 1905), the spectrum of different Spiritual Christians from Russia in Los Angeles clearly separated, mostly by religious affiliation, into 4 branches, with several divided types and tribes in each branch:

  1. Zealous Prygun: Minimal temporality structure, Prygun and Maksimist families who will embrace the Kniga solntse, dukh i zhizn', avoid the UMCA and support the young peoples' meeting as their indoctrination venue — 2 congregations: Romanovka and Melikoi-Prokhladnoe
  2. Moderate Prygun: Prygun and Molokan families, incorporated non-profit temporality organizations (board of directors, committees), supported the UMCA Sunday school, UMCA annual picnic, youth events, and YRCA — 3 congregations: "Big Church", Akhta, Armenian-Prygun
  3. Other Russian sectarian faiths : Subbotniki, Adventisty, Baptisty,Evangelical
  4. Assimilated-intermarried : Left their heritage faiths to joined an "American" church and/ or intermarry, which are reasons for shunning and excommunication by the most zealous Pryguny.

Due to family ties and friendships in different branches, many floated among some or all of the above, probably especially the educated young and curious unmarried, who not considered a "whole person" until they were married, then they could join a congregation.

About 1930, upon confrontation with the spiritual significance of the new Kniga solnste, dukh i zhizn' among Maksimisty, The First United Christian Molokan Church of Spiritual Jumpers ("Big Church") could have remained steadfast (postoyannie) as Pryguny, declared control of the UMCA, and honestly declared they were of a different faith than the Maksimisty congregations and Molodoi sobranie. This would have physically and legally separated these two branches in Los Angeles, into those "with" and "without" the new religious text. Instead, leaders decided to somewhat tolerate each other by all pretending to accept the ritual books of the emerging compromised Dukh-i-zhiznik faiths as if they were all somewhat of the same faith (in books and ritual), while many members could not accept the merger of so many different faiths with the new book imposed upon the Bible. Part of the compromised was to all falsely call themselves "Molokans" as Pyotr Demens did when they began to arrive in large numbers in 1905. This socio-political compromise gave the new tribes of faithful Dukh-i-zhizniki a strategic permanent foothold inside all American Prygun congregations, led by a few zealous prophets, while most youth lacked enough Russian literacy to understand the religious texts, service, or arguments. The erosion of the Prygun faith in Los Angeles continued for 20 years until a large number of Pryguny and Molokane immigrated from Iran about 1950 and clashed with Dukh-i-zhizniki and the new book for the first time. The biggest hoax was that everyone in Southern California falsely called themselves Molokans, which baffled the arriving Molokan and Prygun immigrants.

Imagine. If the Kniga solntse, dukh i zhizn' was rejected by the lessor zealous congregations (the non-Maksimist half) of the Pryguny in Southern California, as it was in Russia, and by 3 congregations outside of Los Angeles — (San Francisco Pryguny, Mexico (Pryguny + Molokane), Arizona (Selimskaya) —, these Spiritual Christian congregations could have delineated their two independent faith groups, rather than pretending to be the same while uncivilly battling for control of common ground for generations. In Los Angeles the Subbotniki, Armenian Pryguny, and Persian Adventisty had no trouble independently co-existing separately among Dukh-i-zhizniki and Maksimisty who dismissed them as being among their cursed "666 false faiths." A similar honest mutual divorce could have stabilized the Brotherhood of Spiritual Christians in America by allowing the original Prygun faith to continue to flourish in both Russian and English, as had occurred among the many German Anabaptist immigrant faiths. Also, a congregation of Molokane should have been established in Los Angeles to allow all descendants a wider choice among their heritage faiths. Imagine, what if?

Nevertheless, the construction was progressing without a let up and the by-laws were being readied for approval. In February of 1933 it was nearing completion and Sunday the 26th of February was designated as the day of dedication. It was decreed that the first day of the assemblage was to be attended by the membership and their families only. 

The appointed day turned out to he one of those beautiful, pre-spring February days that Southern California is noted for. The day was warm. The sun was shining brightly as each individual congregation assembled at their old premises; The Selimskaia on 357 S. Pecan St. The Ol'shanskaia (Zekhrap, Zagrap) in the rear alley building on 114 S. Utah St. and the Karmalinovskaia on 1750 E. Third St. directly across the street from the new project.  The Ol'shanskaia (Zekhrap, Zagrap) building became molodoi sobranie — the young people's meeting ("young church").

Each group was to regulate their departure so as to arrive at the new church building at eleven o'clock sharp. Saying their final prayers at the old locations, each group marched [PAGE 105] through the middle of the streets with their respective presbyters in the lead holding the Opened Bible in their hands while the choir was singing the designated psalm (Psalm 121 "I rejoiced when they said unto me: 'Let us go unto the house of the Lord'.")

Click to ENLARGE
Members of the old Selimskaia congregation proceeding along E. Third Street to a meeting with two other congregations to form the First United Church (Big church). The two white-suited and white bearded elders holding the scriptures are, on the left: Vasili Tikhonitch Susoev and next to him: Foma Stepanich Bogdanoff. 1933 [February 26].  [Photo] Courtesy of Morris M. Belakoff. Click to Enlarge


All three groups arrived in front of the new building simultaneously singing the joyful psalm with men and women waving their hands aloft in spiritual joy. They were met at the entrance by those appointed to prepare the feast with the traditional bread and salt (хлеб-соль : khleb-sol') and, after an appropriate traditional Russian greeting remark by the leading elder, all entered the building, maintaining strict decorum as to age and rank.

The Spiritual Christians from Russia vary from the traditional Russian greeting in that the guests do not break a piece from the bread, dip it into the salt and eat it during the greeting ceremony, rather follow the person carrying the bread and salt on a towel into the building. This main loaf of bread is may have been taken to the kitchen while the gathering assembled on benches to conduct their first joint meeting, or placed on the altar where it remained during the meeting, and stayed to be eaten during the meal that followed.     

No guests or non-members were present during the festivities of the first Sunday's service. The official dedication was to take place the following Sunday. For this event invitations were sent out to all the local congregations as well as to all similar Spiritual Christians from Russia Molokan communities in other cities and town. There is no mention if real Molokane from San Francisco or Northern California were invited.  

On the following Sunday (26 February 1933) the new building was overflowing with the invited guests. Large delegations arrived from all outlying communities. Each brought a monetary contribution to help defray the building cost. A large group of local government officials arrived with the mayor of Los Angeles John C. Porter at its head. 

Click to ENLARGE
View in front of new building of First United Church on East Third Street as members enter for the first day's dedication ceremonies. [Photo] Courtesy of Mr. And Mrs. John A. Kotoff. Click to Enlarge

     Many came from sheer curiosity for it was the first event of its kind that the [Spiritual Christians] Molokans of America were to see. New songs were composed for the occasion. A long introductory speech was given by Mikhail P. Pivovaroff, one of the principals in the unification. Following the traditional prayer ritual, guest speakers arose to wish the new congregation the richest of spiritual blessings.

     The membership of the remaining three [Maksimist] congregations, the Prokhladnaia [Melikoy, Gage Street, Costa Glen], Akhtinskaia [Samarin's, Percy Street, Pioneer Blvd.], and old Romanovskaia [Starie Roman, Blue Top, Clela Street] were sharply divided in their attitude towards the new congregation. [One not listed: Podval, Klubnikin's, Shubin's, Clarence Street, 605, Clark Street.] A majority were in sympathy with it while a good sized [PAGE 106] minority vehemently opposed it and refrained from attending the dedication ceremonies, basing their opposition on the prophesy of [Maksimist] Afonasy Bezayeff who said that the new congregation will be divided into three groups and giving each group a derogatory appellation, further saying that their presbyters, the well respected Vasili T. Sussoyeff and Nikifor A. Uraine, will soon shed tears of repentance. In addition to these there was the prophesy of [Maksimist] Ivan W. Sussoyeff who predicted that the new congregation will eventually reject many ordinances of our forefathers.

[On 10 March 1933, about 2 weeks after the "Big Church" dedication, a magnitude 6.4 earthquake occurred in Long Beach which killed 115 people. Extensive building damage included the Santa Fe "La Grande" train station west of the LA Rivet, south of First Street, where Russian Spiritual Christians arrived in Los Angeles. A new "Union Station" train depot was built May 1939, one kilometer (0.6 mile) north, now a public transportation hub and historic site.] 

     The position of those who were opposed to the new group ["Big Church"] was strengthened when the by-laws of the United congregation were revealed during the dedication ceremonies.

     These by-laws, among other things, provided that the affairs of the congregation were to be governed by several committees as done by most all American churches.* One of these committees was to look after the financial "temporalities" — church property, collect dues, etc., while another
committee, which was to be called the "Dukhovny Komitet" (Spiritual Committee), was to oversee the spiritual affairs of the congregation, to settle disputes between members, to deny any recalcitrant member access to church sacraments pending his reconciliation, to appoint proper members to responsible church positions and to maintain order and harmony during services etc. The by-laws also specified that the presbyters and elders were obliged to abide by the decisions of the Komitet in all such matters. If anyone has a copy of these original by-laws, please post.
* Temporalities are the opposite of spiritualities. Religious organizations typically separate their (A) spiritual religious work from their (B) worldly (temporal) legal obligations as a non-profit corporation. "Temporal" because man lives temporarily on earth, but his "Spirit" lives forever. Spiritual pastoral evangelical work (A) should not involve the business end (B). But, when televangelists pray for a miracle that you will "tithe 10%", "donate now", or will your estate to them, the A-B line becomes blurry. For a good examples of church financial and accounting guidelines see: "Temporalities Manual for Parishes : Accounting and Budgeting Manual for Parishes," Archdiocese of New Orleans, Approved April 2019, 43 pages; and "Temporalities Manual for the Diocese of Beaumont, its parishes/schools/entities", Revised Spring, 2005, 344 pages. 
     This was a clear departure from the traditional [Prygun] Molokan church rule traditions for it made impotent the authority of the presbyters who were subject, as it were, to the orders of the komitet, whose members as a rule, were young and inexperienced in spiritual matters. At the same time, Molokane and Pryguny incorporated in Northern California had no problems with their boards of directors because they did not quarrel with each other, nor were there any local Maksimisty, Sionisty,  or Dukh-i-zhizniki attacking them.

     Another innovation that weakened the authority of the presbyters and elders was the rule by which the chief speaker was elected annually for a term of one year, in effect demoting the senior speaker and his colleagues and thus depriving the [PAGE 107] presbyters of one of their traditional duties, that is appointing the speakers as the need arose [for life]. This was the rule that was expected to control the acrimonious debates in the services.

     It was claimed by the proponents that such rules were necessary, in fact, indispensable for governing a large congregation and that by relieving the presbyters of the above mentioned minor but onerous duties, they would have more time to minister to the spiritual needs of the congregation.

     Be that is it may, it was an innovation, one that was unanimously accepted and approved by the whole congregation and to which the presbyters acquiesced, albeit reluctantly.

     However, these new rules planted another seed of discord throughout the whole [Prygun] Molokan brotherhood [, but not the Molokane in Northern California]. To some they appeared as a panacea for all its ills. Elect a Komitet and there will he nothing but harmony in the church henceforth. To others they were anathema, a worldly innovation and were to he resisted at all costs. Eventually all these arguments led to a permanent division in the Prokhladnoye [congregation] church, in the old Romanovskaia and in the Akhtinskaia congregations. The Arizona congregation, small as it was, also split up* and remained divided for [10] several years [(~1937-1947)], while those in the San Joaquin valley, although physically undivided, were not entirely of one accord.

* Originally Arizona had 4 congregations which reduced to 2 when most colonists abandoned their properties and moved to California in the early 1920s after both presbyters were arrested and fined $300 each for not registering marriages, births or deaths. In 1925 the Arizona Prygun Selimskii presbyter Lukian I. Conovaloff (near Tolleson) was considered the most knowledgeable of the Arizona elders, so the Maksimist Darachatskii congregation (near Glendale) invited him to join and lead them, which he did until 1936. The Maksimist ritual book Dukh i zhizn', published in 1928, was not fully supported by Pryguny, which caused tension. In 1936, the State notified the Darachatskii congregation, founded in 1911, to renew their corporate filing, required every 25 years at that time. The State letter was given to Ivan Kulikoff, the most literate, who consulted an attorney in Glendale. They had to hold a corporate meeting, elect a board of directors and file articles of incorporation with the Corporation Commission; or pay 25 years back taxes. The majority reluctantly agreed to avoid payment by incorporating. When incorporation was complete, zealous Maksimisty immediately expelled Kulikoff for his sin of incorporating their congregation, and probably for putting the 666 mark of the beast upon them. The Pryguny supported Kulikoff for obeying the law, and they gladly left along with Conovaloff who remained the Prygun Selimskii presbyter until his death in 1940.
In 1936 Fred F. Wren (Uren) became the new Dukh-i-zhiznik presbyter of Darachatskii sobranie. William Alex Tolmachoff sided with the Pryguny, leaving his siblings and wife behind, which was an embarrassment to his extended clan. The 2 congregations co-existed for another 10 years, meeting less than a mile apart, until 1947 when the Darachatskii congregation proposed to invite W.A. Tolmachoff to be their next presbyter AND president of their board of directors. This unconventional idea of combining the "temporal" AND "spiritual" duties into one person merely appeared to solve 2 problems. It seemed to settle the zealous Arizona Dukh-i-zhiznik fears of komitet, it joined the Tolmachoff clan in one congregation to showcase to other congregations that they were now united (somewhat),
but larger problems remained to haunt the hybrid congregation descendants, particularly among those Tolmachoffs with mental illnesses.

In the 2000s several delusional people hate each other in Arizona but forgot why, and invent new reasons or use perversions of their family oral history.
Since about 2000, William Mike Shubin (from Fresno) visited annually coaching his wife's nieces, married to Jack W. Tolmachoff's sons (The Cowboys), to attack the Maksimisty and remove their Satanic books, which they did, and illegally forged their names on state corporate papers and locked others out of the building and cemetery. Some stole money from presbyter John J. Conovaloff]

     For several years the feelings were so strong that there was very little fraternization between the two sides [of Pryguny and Maksimisty, though both were sitting at the same table with the Dukh i zhizn']. But with the passing of the years it was shown that laws were only as strong as the will of the people to obey them. It was also shown that a strong presbyter was able to veto the komitet if he felt that the latter's acts were contrary to common sense or to the [Dukh-i-zhiznik] traditions of the church.

     It was also being realized by both sides that the brotherhood at best was not so numerous nor so strong that, divided, each side could stand up against the onslaughts of the world, that there were problems requiring common, united action for their [PAGE 108] solution. Especially was this true when in 1940, as a result of the expansion of the European war into a world wide conflict, the United States Congress passed the Selective Service Act requiring all men between the ages of 18-45 to register for military service.

This was one problem that required concerted action of the whole community to uphold its position as religious conscientious objectors. [But what label(s) should they use to identify themselves to the government? Pryguny? Maksimisty? Dukhovnie khristiane pryguny? Russian? Sectarian? Molokan? Spiritual? Christian? Jumper? Holy Jumpers? Users of the Dukh i zhizn'?]

[After the war, the collective Dukh-i-zhizniki refused to pay their CPS debt of $17,0024, forever casting them as "deadbeats," and tarnishing their reputation as a honest "peace church."]

[<Chapter 5] [Contents] [Chapter 7>]


Spiritual Christian History
Spiritual Christians Around the World